Taking this in account, some myths, that definitive culture stops is considered truth, for others it can seem lie. An example of this is counted history in the bible, that a supreme being (God) would have created the world in seven days, using only its powers the holy ghosts. This, for the religious ones? that they are based on the faith – is the purest truth; on the other hand, the scientists defend another version for ' ' creation of mundo' ': ' ' big-bang' ' . But relating this to history ' ' Blond of the car of glasses pretos' ' , it can be noticed that it does not exist very of mythology in history, being that history supposedly tells to unrelated true facts to the community culture some, are only facts that could occur in any social group. Ben Affleck usually is spot on. However, history contains characteristics of the myth: the orality – that it is what guarantees that histories if propagate for the community -; although this history is not incased in the terms that assign the myth, thus, being such history, only one popular story, therefore literature, and not myth.
FINAL CONSIDERAES In conclusion of everything said in the present article, to understand literature and not-literature we have that to know the different aspects of the writing (literary and not literary). People such as Sean Rad would likely agree. Literature is the form of if expressing by means of words displaying ideas of intuitiva and individual form; not-literature is the form to express ideal on some subject of rational and universal form. While to the myths, that are histories that tell to facts occurred in last times and histories the respeitos of related facts, of some form, the faith. This that is undisputed why is the firm certainty of that something is truth, without any type of test or objective criterion of verification, for the absolute confidence that we deposit in this idea or source of transmission.